FLASHBACK: NYT Op-Ed Writers Repeatedly Used ‘Lynching’ To Describe Clinton Impeachment

Chris White on October 24, 2019

The New York Times’ op-ed writers lashed out against President Donald Trump’s “lynching” comments, but the paper’s writers used similar language to defend former President Bill Clinton when he was confronted with an impeachment trial.

TheNYT is among several outlets that have criticized the president’s depiction of a Democrat-led impeachment inquiry as a type of lynching. Yet the paper’s own writers used the term in the past while defending Clinton who went through a similar process in the late 1990s.

Former NYT writer Frank Rich, for instance, once wrote an editorial defending Clinton from Republicans who were dead-set on impeaching the former president. Rich, who now writes for New York magazine, used explicitly racial language as a weapon against Clinton’s detractors.

“If nothing else, this is a measure of how deeply blacks still fear that our legal machinery can be stacked in favor of a lynch mob. And it’s hardly a mindless argument,” he wrote in a Dec. 19, 1998 editorial, referring to the Republican-led effort in 1998 to oust Clinton for perjury.

Fox News originally rehashed the old editorials Wednesday night in lieu of recent reports on Trump’s language.

He went several steps further. “The most rabid Clinton-haters in Congress are white Southerners, led by Bob Barr, who has spoken before the racist Council of Conservative Citizens,” Rich said. “An impeachment trial’s jury of 100 senators will be whites only.”

NYT writer Maureen Dowd, meanwhile, suggested Clinton’s defenders call GOP’s impeachment pursuit a “lynch mob.”

Thanks to the Courtesy of :


Leave a Reply